"Without struggle, no progress and no
result..." George Gurdjieff, philosopher, spiritual
"The way of all peace is to scale the mountain
of Self..." 1st Tenet, Novus
“Every man is born with aptitudes which
give him access to vital and formative knowledge by one of these roads; either by the road of studying man and his
works, or by the road of studying nature and her works. The business of instruction is to seize and develop
these aptitudes. The great and complete spirits which have all the aptitudes for both roads of knowledge are
‘Culture and Anarchy: An Essay in Political and Social Criticism’, Matthew
Dr. Earnest Holmes, founder of Religious
Science (a New
Thought ‘religion’) believed that Science, Religion and Philosophy could be brought
together. Science and religion are often viewed as antagonists in the quest for truth. A conflict
of truths with origins in as far as antiquity: tension between Athens, ancient well-spring of
secular philosophy, and Jerusalem, the symbol of revealed religious truth.
The purpose of The Golden
Seat besides being a pleasurable piece of art, is to
harmonize Science, Religion and Philosophy and to seek a grounding in the quest for Truth, Beauty and Goodness.
As for truth, Anne
Lamott, in her book, “Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life", discusses how to get at the truth by
staying in the present moment and paying attention. She calls this the “writing frame of
“Writing is about learning to pay
attention and to communicate what is going on. Now, if you ask me, what’s going on is that we’re all up to
here in it, and probably the most important thing is that we not yell at each other. Otherwise we’d all just
be barking away like Pekingese: “Ah! Stuck in the shit! And it’s your fault, you did this…”
Writing involves seeing people suffer and, as Robert Stone once put it, finding some meaning therein. But you
can’t do that if you’re not respectful. If you look at people and just see sloppy clothes or rich clothes,
you’re going to get them wrong.”
The Golden Seat’s ‘Frame of Mind’ is
spiritual. The ‘Archimedean Point’, where we choose to stand, or
to sit on a Golden
Seat, in order to form the idea of the totality of meaning, is
There are two grand movements in the Religious/Philosophical
Ascend: Matter to Spirit
(Transcendent). The Many to One. The path of
Descend: Spirit to Matter (Immanence, the Divine).
The One to Many. The path of compassion.
Transcendent philosophy is situated within
eternal reality, whereas Immanence philosophy is based within temporal reality. In a broad sense this is God
and Goddess – as Eros, and Agape, Wisdom and Compassion, Ascent and Descent. Ascending Eros and descending
Agape, transcendence and immanence, the love that reaches up and the love that reaches down.
In the secular philosophical view, we see the
two grand movements depicted in Raphael’s painting (1510), The School of
Athens. Plato (left) is pointing up representing the
‘generalities’ and his belief in the Forms (Ideals). This is the ascendant drive: matter to
spirit. On the right, Aristotle is pointing down, representing the ‘particulars’ and his belief in
knowledge through empirical observation and experience.
This is the descendant drive: spirit to matter.
In A Brief History of Everything,
Wilber, eminent American philosopher, summarizes the
religious-spiritual view of these two grand movements:
“The war between Ascenders and the
Descenders has been one of the central and defining conflicts in the Western mind. Beginning with
Augustine, the Ascenders and the Descenders
were in relentless and often brutal conflict, and this saddled the West with two completely incompatible
…The God of the Ascenders was otherworldly to the core – my kingdom is not of this
world. It was puritanical, usually monastic and ascetic, and it saw the body, the flesh, and especially sex,
as archetypal sins. It sought always to flee the Many and find the One. It was purely transcendental,
and was always pessimistic about finding happiness in the world. It shunned time in favor of eternity, and
hid its face in shame from the shadows of the world.
…The God of the Descenders counseled exactly the opposite. It fled from the One
into the embrace of the Many. It was love with the visible, sensible God, and sometimes Goddess. It was
a God of pure immanence. Greater variety was the goal of this God, glory in the celebration of this
diversity. It celebrated the sense, and the body, and sexuality, and earth. And delighted in a
creation-centered spirituality that saw each sunrise, each moonrise and the visible blessing of the
Mr. Wilber elaborates on this via the
ignore for the moment the more provincial and stage-specific notions of the horticultural Great Mother
as farming protectress, and the agrarian images of God the Father as a Big Daddy in the Sky – these mythic images
are not very useful for an overall picture – and if you look instead to the broad understanding of God and Goddess
(Father-Mother God) then the balanced picture that emerges is something like this:
The Masculine Face of Spirit (Father God) is preeminently Eros, the Ascending and
transcendental current of the Kosmos, ever-striving to find greater wholeness and wider unions, to break the limits
and reach for the sky, to rise to unending revelations of greater Good and Glory, always rejecting the shallower in
search of the deeper, rejecting the lower in search of the higher.
The Feminine Face of Spirit (Mother God) is preeminently Agape, or Compassion, the
Descending and immanent and manifesting current of the Kosmos, the principle of embodiment, and bodily incarnation,
and relationship, and relational and manifest embrace, touching each and every being with perfect and equal grace,
rejecting nothing, embracing all.
Where Father God strives for the Good of the One transcendental wisdom, Mother God
embraces the Many with Goodness and immanent care.”
The Golden Seat seeks to harmonize both the
Ascending and the Descending movements. To embrace the healthy and heal the unhealthy. To not be
repressive and at the same time to not be regressive (ie, to go back to the ‘acorn’ – some imagined ‘pristine’
state of nature; that the ‘oak tree is somehow a horrible violation the of acorn’).
When, Jesus Christ of Nazareth, said, “Seek and
you shall find. Knock and it shall be opened unto you” (Matt. 7:7), He was speaking of Spiritual
Discovery. All the major spiritual leaders, Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad, were aware that humankind is
engaged in a process that leads us toward higher understanding of ourselves, the world and
God. To achieve a higher understanding of our Lord, we reexamine His major
1) Redemption. To be free from the consequences of sin – ‘missing the
mark’. The greatest tragedy of institutionalized religion is its teaching that God is vengeful, which
instills a fear of God in our hearts. Those that purport that god is fearful are dark. The one ‘sin’ to
watch out for is the despair – it fuels the darkness, a spiritual devoid.
2) Healer. The most important thing for a healer to know is the
human mind. The power of the mind can create illnesses,
but it also can cure illnesses. "Physician, heal thyself" (Luke 4:23).
3) Savior. To save oneself not from a subterranean 'hell' but from the hell on Earth; to perfect
oneself and to not come back. The word salvation means “salve” or “balm to the soul”
Salvation means to remain whole, to be in good health, to ease one’s soul. And everyone, atheist, agnostic, skeptic and believer alike, is trying to stay in good
mental and spriitual health, to keep their psyche or spirit intact, to keep body and soul together.
They're trying to avert chaos within and beyond the self.
Forgiveness. Our Lord forgave the Romans who
crucified him because they, too, were ‘sons’ of God. Within each of us resides the spark of the
5) Love. Love your brother and help the poor (it’s taught in most religions).
(Caution: be very careful not to pick up somebody else’s Karma while they are living – you don’t want to get
caught in someone else’s ‘Dome’). It is a very spiritual thing to ask yourself what is good for you. That is
not being selfish. It is helping yourself to become fully human, fully self-aware, fully caring. If you are helping
others much of the time, ask yourself “What am I getting out of it?” It you keep coming up with big zeros,
then stop doing it. Helping the ‘poor’ has its limitations; they too have lessons to learn and the ability to help
themselves. We need to first heal ourselves.
In his book, "I Love Jesus, I hate
Michaels tells us:
“Because we have greater understanding
of the material world and human
that was the case 2,000 years ago, we also have the foundation for receiving a deeper understanding of the
spiritual side of life. When our Lord said ‘I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them
now’ (John, 16:12), his purpose was to come to the people of his time to overcome their spiritual blindness.
Some Christians will say that the leadership of their church is in communion with Christ and is constantly being
led by him. However, for the past 2,000 years no mainstream Christian church has been willing to
recognize any new revelations (truths) from Jesus. The vast majority of Christian churches affirm the belief
that Jesus has had not to say to humanity beyond what he said in the official scriptures…I believe Jesus came to
this planet partly to call us to change our view of God so that we could develop a more mature and sophisticated
relationship to God. Human beings have an element in psyches that resists change, and this element cause us
to be blind to the necessity for change. When we suffer from this spiritual blindness, we tend to reject the
messengers of change that God sends to us. It is through understanding and knowledge that will empower us to
overcome the resistance to change.”
At the conclusion of her book, "Beyond
Pagels, Professor of Religion at Princeton University,
“We have also seen the hazards—even
terrible harm—that sometimes result from unquestioning acceptance of religious authority. Most of us, sooner
or later, fine that, at critical points in our lives, we must strike out on our own to make a path where none
exists. What I have come to love in the wealth and diversity of our religious traditions—and the communities
that sustain them—is that they offer the testimony of innumerable people to spiritual discovery. Thus they
encourage those who endeavor, in Jesus’ words, to ‘seek and you shall find.’ “
The Golden Seat focuses on knowledge. What is spirituality?
Knowledge, and more knowledge (mystical knowledge is another word, but people typically see mystical knowledge as
beyond their grasp, or above God’s law, so ‘Metaphysical’ knowledge is the better
word). Metaphysical knowledge is a curative; people are brought to their own level of salvation and can
save themselves from the possessions of ignorance, of pain, of sorrow, of stubbornness, of stupidity, of
addiction. Fighting ignorance is the good fight, where ignorance means separation from Light and
Enlightenment. All of the darkness in the world, and evil that creeps in, is ignorance. Enlightenment
requires learning not get too earthbound and not to reside solely in the body (Lower
Mind), but to live about the body (Higher
Mind). To realize that the world is full of deception (it has to
be that way or we would not perfect). The goal is to keep oneself elevated enough so as to get through the
muck and to try to help others get through it too.
It is difficult to live in ignorance, to be
guilty of ignorance, but looking at that positively, this guilt helps us to hone our senses. We are all
human. It is a terrible strain to aim be perfect. It is a terrible burden to be always right, always
wonderful, always great, always perfect. And we do get audited – for that makes us an example for
others. Tenacity is a great trait, for if we do not give up we will succeed. If we keep on going regardless
of personal struggles or barriers (lack or over-abundance of money, unearned moral superiority, addictions) we will
win. When we rise above ignorance, we have less pettiness to deal with.
The aim to ‘rise above ignorance’ is also found in
an ancient Buddhist text:
"The noble truth deals with the cause of
all suffering, which is clinging or grasping. It is a futile grasping of life based on the wrong point of
view, which is called ignorance. Out of this ignorance we divide the perceived world into individual and
separate things and thus attempt to combine all the reality into fixed categories created by the mind. As
long as this view prevails, we are bound to experience frustration after frustration, trying to cling to things and
people which we see as firm and persistent, but which, in fact, are transient and every changing.
We are thus trapped in a vicious circle where every action generates further action,
and the answer to each question poses a new question. This vicious circle is known as the round of birth and
death and is driven by karma, the never ending chain of cause and effect. This suffering and frustration can
be ended when we know that all things are transient. It is possible then to transcend or to ascend from this
vicious circle to free one’s self from the bondage of our lessons and to reach a state of total
Kim Michaels, author of
I Love Jesus, I Hate Christianity, asserts that ‘we have the foundation for receiving a deeper understanding the spiritual
side of life’. In discussing knowledge it is important to address the Sources of
The figures within The Golden
Seat are people and Angles. And its key proposition is that Angels
exist. If you ask people who truly believe in angels “how do you know they exist?”, they’ll confidently
say, “I don’t have to prove it, I just believe”.
Some philosophers will use the
classic Theories of
Truth to argue the question of belief.
In his integral-style book
The Good, the True and the Beautiful – A Quest for
Meaning, Michael Boylan, professor of philosophy at Marymount
University, discusses the limits of rational analysis:
‘…rationality seeks to demonstrably to
prove all propositions [eg,”the sum of the interior angles of a triangle is 180 degrees” to “God Exists”]. In
cases in which there is no empirical test for verifying a principle, all the best reason can do is to offer various
plausible alternatives. The resolution can only come about through appeal to the personal worldview
Boylan's arguments are based from a Source of
Knowledge from an immanence standpoint (temporal reality – memory, observation, perception). Because “St.
Patrick said so”, the churchman or churchwoman and his/her flock took it on blind faith that the Holy Trinity is
"one God in three divine persons" (St. Patrick's 'three-leaf clover' analogy as told to
children). Modern Metaphysical
Spirituality takes a transcendent view of the divine. It
is almost a knowing that angels exist (and, for that matter, that God exist).
In Ken Wilber’s lexicon, ‘personal worldview
imperative’ is the Upper Left Quad – that of the individual and his or her’s interior awareness – the ‘intentional’
of AQAL. Interior awareness is the home
of intuitive knowledge: ‘vibrations’; ‘ to feel in one’s ‘bones’; ‘gut feeling’; ‘ a hunch’ –
The highest source of knowledge transcends
propositional philosophy which seeks to understand by exploration and investigation and to reach conclusions by
reason rather than by intuition. With intuition it is difficult
to communicate what is or an inner knowing because it is internal to oneself. Interpretation of experiences
and thoughts is required; thus we say “you know what I mean?” when we try to explain something personal or
intuitive to a friend or colleague.
The pure externalists (logical thinker in
the empirical-rational deductive camp) will
object to the intuitive stance. The intellectualist insist on logical deductions to prove
something. However, in regards to Belief, the logical thinker must acknowledge that ‘to grasp the
basis of phenomena through logical thought may be impossible since logical thought is itself a part of the
phenomena and wholly involved in them.’
Sometimes an image communicates an idea better
than a rational explanation (even though its ‘fitness’ cannot be strictly proven). Going back to Belief, an
endearing picture would be the lovable grandmotherly‘Oracle’ of the movie The
Matrix, of who we could ask, “do angels
exist? ”. Our ‘heart of hearts’, would expect her to
reply, “of course my dear, and when you leave this room you’ll feel
right as rain”.
Of course, there are non-believers who don’t
believe that angels exist. And that is all perfectly well, for one can still enjoy the beauty of
a Chagall painting and yet not believe in
"You're always going to fall down and you got to get up. That's the key to
Lee, Boston Red Sox Pitcher (1969-1978)
Besides Spiritual Discovery and Higher Knowledge,
another ‘Frame of Mind’ of the Golden Seat is the belief in a ‘Win-Win’ philosophy.
In his ground-breaking book, Nonzero, author
Robert Wright discusses the overall benefits non-zero-sum solutions:
zero-sumgames, can have “win-win” outcomes. People sometimes think of them as orgies of amiability, they can
be, but they usually are not. Almost always, with a non-zero-sum game, there is a dimension of zero-sumness – a
conflict of interest.
For example, when you buy a new car, there is a range of prices that make the
purchase worthwhile from you point of view (say, anything under $28K) and a range of prices that make the sale
profitable for the dealer (say, anything over $27K). Since there is overlap of those ranges – the
possibility of an outcome that improves the fortunes of both players – the game is non-zero-sum. But there is
still a conflict of interest, because the closer the price is to $27K the better for you, and the closer it is to
$28K the better for the dealer. Movement along the spectrum between $27K and $28K is entirely zero-sum,
because it lowers the fortunes of one player exactly as it raises the fortunes of the other player. Hence
bargaining, which can sometimes lead to deception, suspicion, buyer’s remorse, and so on. The bargaining can
also lead to the deal’s falling through – a lose-lose outcome, since each player has missed out on the gain that a
deal would have brought.
But a lose-lose outcome makes a game a non-zero-sum. An outcome that’s negative
for both parties doesn’t add up to zero; there is a correlation of fortunes between the players, even if it’s for
the worst. Besides, avoiding a double loss is, in relative terms a least, a kind of double win. The
decades-long nuclear standoff during the Cold War was thus nonzero-sum – not because each year of successfully
avoided nuclear war brought mutual, tangible gain, but because, if the game had been played differently, it could
have brought mutual, tangible loss. The non-zero-sum dynamic brought a kind of tolerance; though East and
West considered each other more or less evil, neither tried to wipe out the other.”
The ‘non-zero-sum’ philosophy can be applied to
religious tolerance in that tolerance is more likely when you see yourself as losing from intolerance, regardless
of whether the situation seems zero-sum or non-zero-sum. When the situation is seen as non-zero-sum, when
both sides see themselves losing, then mutual tolerance makes sense. Throughout the ages history has shown that
people with other world-views had to come together for mutual gain. A principle in motion since antiquity:
the championing inter-faith tolerance and mutual respect.
When people face win-win situations and think
they can work together, they are open to one another’s worldview, not to mention one another’s continued
existence. To share a stake in the success. An economic example of a ‘lose-lose’ mentality is when
labor leaders view markets as closed - someone’s got to lose for another to win.
In his presidency, Bill Clinton commented on the
value of holding a Win-Win philosophy:
“But in game theory, a zero-sum game is
one where, in order for one person to win, somebody has to lose. A non-zero-sum game is a game in which you can win
and the person you're playing with can win, as well. And the argument of the book is that, notwithstanding all the
terrible things that happened in the 20th century--the abuses of science by the Nazis, the abuses of organization
by the communists, all the things that continue to be done in the name of religious or political
purity--essentially, as societies grow more and more connected, and we become more interdependent, one with the
other, we are forced to find more and more non-zero-sum solutions. That is, ways in which we can all
win.And that's basically the message I've
been trying to preach for eight years here...We have to have an expanding idea of who is in our family. And we in
the United States, because we're so blessed, have particular responsibilities to people not only within our borders
who have been left behind, but beyond our borders who otherwise will never catch up if we don't do our part.
Because we are all part of the same human family, and because, actually, life is more and more a non-zero-sum game,
so that the better they do, the better we'll do.” (Applause)
Nonzero is a sort of a reverse social
Darwinism: the more complex societies get and the more complex the networks of interdependence within and beyond
community and national borders get, the more people are forced in their own interests to find non-zero-sum
solutions. The pressing goal for a healthy future is to find win-win solutions instead of win-lose
President Clinton continues to discuss the
argument for a non-zero outlook:
“…to succeed, even in positions of
leadership, where there is a competition for the position, the measure of success is not so much whether you won at
somebody else's expense, but whether you got what you wanted because you enabled other people to achieve their
dreams and to do what they want.”